Bulstrode NW, Shrotria S. Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast. 2001;10(2):124–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chan SW, Cheung PS, Lam SH. Cosmetic outcome and percentage of breast volume excision in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. World J Surg. 2010;34(7):1447–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA. Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(2):313–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thurfjell E, Hsieh CC, Lipworth L, Ekbom A, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D. Breast size and mammographic pattern in relation to breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996;5(1):37–41.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li X, Zhou C, Wu Y, Chen X. Relationship between formulaic breast volume and risk of breast cancer based on linear measurements. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):989.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scutt D, Lancaster GA, Manning JT. Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(2):R14.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(9):670–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Untch M, Banys-Paluchowski M, Brucker SY, Budach W, Denkert C, Ditsch N, et al. Treatment of early breast cancer: the 18th St Gallen international breast cancer consensus conference against the background of current german treatment recommendations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023;83(9):1102–16.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kolberg HC, Hartkopf AD, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Muller V, Schutz F, et al. Update breast cancer 2023 part 3—expert opinions of early stage breast cancer therapies. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023;83(9):1117–26.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(21):1622–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Little LE, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL. The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 1998;78(9):1233–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Loehberg CR, Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haeberle L, Hein A, Rauh C, et al. Assessment of mammographic density before and after first full-term pregnancy. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010;19(6):405–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hack CC, Emons J, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Adler W, Gass P, et al. Association between mammographic density and pregnancies relative to age and BMI: a breast cancer case-only analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;166(3):701–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hartkopf AD, Fehm T, Welslau M, Mueller V, Schutz F, Fasching PA, et al. Update breast cancer 2023 part 1—early stage breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023;83(6):653–63.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ditsch N, Wocke A, Untch M, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, et al. AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early breast cancer: update 2022. Breast Care (Basel). 2022;17(4):403–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fehm TN, Welslau M, Muller V, Luftner D, Schutz F, Fasching PA, et al. Update breast cancer 2022 part 5—early stage breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023;83(3):289–98.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schneeweiss A, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Jackisch C, Loibl S, et al. AGO algorithms for the treatment of breast cancer: update 2021. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(10):1101–11.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wunderle M, Ruebner M, Haberle L, Schwenke E, Hack CC, Bayer CM, et al. RANKL and OPG and their influence on breast volume changes during pregnancy in healthy women. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5171.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2):468–79.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schultz RC, Dolezal RF, Nolan J. Further applications of Archimedes’ principle in the correction of asymmetrical breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 1986;16(2):98–101.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Longo B, Farcomeni A, Ferri G, Campanale A, Sorotos M, Santanelli F. The BREAST-V: a unifying predictive formula for volume assessment in small, medium, and large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(1):1e–7e.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shanley E, Johnston A, Hillick D, Ng KC, Sugrue M. Digital breast volume estimation (DBVE)—a new technique. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1091):20180406.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(6):1643–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rha EY, Choi IK, Yoo G. Accuracy of the method for estimating breast volume on three-dimensional simulated magnetic resonance imaging scans in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(1):14–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A. The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast. 2016;28:121–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast. 2007;16(2):137–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, et al. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(6):602–10.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54(5):471–6; discussion 7–8.

Koch MC, Adamietz B, Jud SM, Fasching PA, Haeberle L, Karbacher S, et al. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35(5):847–55.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Killaars RC, Preubeta MLG, de Vos NJP, van Berlo C, Lobbes MBI, van der Hulst R, et al. Clinical assessment of breast volume: can 3D imaging be the gold standard? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(11): e3236.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bai L, Lundstrom O, Johansson H, Meybodi F, Arver B, Sandelin K, et al. Clinical assessment of breast symmetry and aesthetic outcome: can 3D imaging be the gold standard? J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2022;57(1–6):145–52.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pham M, Alzul R, Elder E, French J, Cardoso J, Kaviani A, et al. Evaluation of Vectra(R) XT 3D surface imaging technology in measuring breast symmetry and breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(1):1–7.

Article  PubMed