Tohno E, Umemoto T, Ito A, Kujiraoka Y, Koshikawa K, Fukuda Y, Mori K, Ma E, Takahashi H. Interobserver agreement in evaluation of breast composition and differences in sensitivity according to breast composition. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2015;24(1):113–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA, Shumak RS, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Boyd NF. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics. 1998;18(6):1587–98.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki A, Kuriyama S, Kawai M, Amari M, Takeda M, Ishida T, Ohnuki K, Nishino Y, Tsuji I, Shibuya D, Ohuchi N. Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(11):2264–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sprague BL, Conant EF, Onega T, Garcia MP, Beaber EF, Herschorn SD, Lehman CD, Tosteson AN, Lacson R, Schnall MD, Kontos D, Haas JS, Weaver DL, Barlow WE, PROSPR Consortium. Variation in mammographic breast density assessments among radiologists in clinical practice: a multicenter observational study. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(7):457–64.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(3):W292–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leong SP, Shen ZZ, Liu TJ, Agarwal G, Tajima T, Paik NS, Sandelin K, Derossis A, Cody H, Foulkes WD. Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries? World J Surg. 2010;34(10):2308–24.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ishihara S, Taira N, Kawasaki K, Ishibe Y, Mizoo T, Nishiyama K, Iwamoto T, Nogami T, Motoki T, Shien T, Matsuoka J, Doihara H, Komoike Y, Sato S, Kanazawa S. Association between mammographic breast density and lifestyle in Japanese women. Acta Med Okayama. 2013;67(3):145–51.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dai H, Yan Y, Wang P, Liu P, Cao Y, Xiong L, Luo Y, Pan T, Ma X, Wang J, Yang Z, Liu X, Chen C, Huang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Hao X, Ye Z, Chen K. Distribution of mammographic density and its influential factors among Chinese women. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(4):1240–51.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bae JM, Shin SY, Kim EH, Kim YN, Nam CM. Distribution of dense breasts using screening mammography in Korean women: a retrospective observational study. Epidemiol Health. 2014;4(36): e2014027.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ohnuki K, Umemura A, Asano S, Usami S, Watanabe M. The clinical significance of compressed breast thickness in mammography: the reality of dense breast and efficient breast cancer screening. Jpn J Breast Cancer. 2019;34(1):55–63.

Google Scholar 

Sato A, Suzuki A, Tada H, Harada N, Hamanaka Y, Ebata A, Motonari T, Ishida T. Relationship between compression breast thickness (CBT) and breast density by mammography in breast cancer screening. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2021;30(2):163–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Klein R, Aichinger H, Dierker J, Jansen JT, Joite-Barfuss S, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Zoetelief J. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(4):651–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45(11):3225–40.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kai T, Ninomiya J, Saito T, Nakano S, Yagata H. A study on the consistency between the measured value of mammary gland measurement software and visual judgment. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2021;30(1):87–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mehnati P, Alizadeh H, Hoda H. Relation between mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk: considering BMI, compressed breast thickness and age of women in Tabriz. Iran Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(4):2259–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lau S, Abdul Aziz YF, Ng KH. Mammographic compression in Asian women. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4): e0175781.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Du X, Yu N, Zhang Y, Wang J. The relationship of the mean glandular dose with compressed breast thickness in mammography. J Public Health Emerg. 2017;1:32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Matsumoto M, Nishizawa K, Akiyama Y, Horita K, Kato H, Ishioka A. The mean breast thickness for Japanese patients for use in estimating the glandular dose in mammography. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2000;9(1):95–102.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jamal N, Ng KH, McLean D. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(904):238–45.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Noma M, Ozaki S, Ishikura M, Saito H, Itamoto T. Compressed breast thickness of mammography and detection of breast lesion considering breast content ratio. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2021;30(2):173–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Oiwa M, Suda N, Morita T, Takahashi Y, Sato Y, et al. Validity of computed mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness and breast composition for stratification of masking risk in Japanese women. Breast Cancer. 2023;30(4):541–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ohuchi N, Ishida T, Kawai M, Narikawa Y, Yamamoto S, Sobue T. Randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–49 (J-START): research design. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(2):275–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ishida T, Suzuki A, Kawai M, Narikawa Y, Saito H, Yamamoto S, et al. A randomized controlled trial to verify the efficacy of the use of ultrasonography in breast cancer screening aged 40–49 (J-START): 76 196 women registered. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(2):134–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T, Kawai M, Yamamoto S, Zheng YF, J-STAR investigator groups, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10016):341–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ohnuki K, Tsunoda H, Tohno E, Iisato U, Powa M, Obane N, The Study Group for Breast Cancer Screening in Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology, et al. The Criteria for mammography screening combined with ultrasonography (Japanese). Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2012;21(3):273–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ohnuki K, Tohno E, Tsunoda H, Uematasu T, Nakajima Y. Overall assessment system of combined mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer. 2021;28:254–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki S, Tsunoda H, Kawakami M, Hasegawa H, Yonetsu K, Oyama Y, et al. Evaluation of the recall criteria for breast cancer screening combined with mammography and ultrasonography (Japanese). Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2013;22(1):115–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology (JABTS). The guidelines for breast ultrasound diagnosis. 4th edition Tokyo: Nankodo; 2020.

Japan Radiology Society/Japan Society of Radiological Technology. Mammography guideline. 4th edition Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin; 2021.

The combined Assessment Committee of the Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening. The overall assessment manual for combined screening of mammography and ultrasound. Tokyo: Shinoharashinsha; 2015.

Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Chen Z, Nagata C, Gram IT. Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9387-5. (Epub 2006 Sep 29).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):727–37.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

National Cancer Center: https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/stat/screening/process-indicator.html, 2024/3/27

Gillman J, Chun J, Schwartz S, Schnabel F, Moy L. The relationship of obesity, mammographic breast density, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer. Clin Imaging. 2016;40(6):1167–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wada K, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Oze I, Wakai K, Tsuji I, Sugawara Y, Mizoue T, Tanaka K, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Sasazuki S, Research Group for the Development and Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Strategies in Japan. Body mass index and breast cancer risk in Japan: a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(2):519–24.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(11):1141–51.