A study to assess the impact of the cobas point-of-care PCR assay (SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B) on patient clinical management in the emergency department of the University of California at Davis Medical Center

Elsevier

Available online 18 September 2023, 105597

Journal of Clinical VirologyAuthor links open overlay panel, , , , Highlights•

Point-of-care (POC) testing reduced order-to-result turnaround time for SARS-CoV-2

ED length of stay increased for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients after POC testing

Antibiotic prescribing was lower following implementation of the POC method

Antiviral prescribing was higher following implementation of the POC method

AbstractBackground

Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for reduction of transmission and clinical decision-making. Several rapid (<30 minutes) molecular point-of-care (POC) tests based on nucleic acid amplification exist for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B infections.

Methods

This unblinded, pre-post study enrolled consecutive patients with symptoms/signs consistent with SARS-CoV-2 infection presenting to the University of California, Davis emergency department (ED). Outcomes following implementation of the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B test for use on the cobas Liat System (intervention: December 2020–May 2021) were compared with previous standard-of-care using centralized laboratory reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods (control: April 2020–October 2020).

Results

Electronic health records of 8879 symptomatic patient visits were analyzed, comprising 4339 and 4540 visits and 538 and 638 positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results in the control and intervention periods, respectively. Compared with the control period, turnaround time (TAT) was shorter in the intervention period (median 0.98 vs 12.30 hours; p<0.0001). ED length of stay (LOS) was generally longer in the intervention period compared with the control period, but for those SARS-CoV-2-negative who were admitted, ED LOS was shorter (median 12.53 vs 17.93 hours; p<0.0001). The rate of antibiotic prescribing was lower in the intervention than in the control period (42.86% vs 49.16%; p<0.0001) and antiviral prescribing was higher (7.64% vs 5.49%; p<0.0001).

Conclusion

This real-world study confirms faster TAT with a POC RT-PCR method in an emergency care setting and highlights the importance of rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection to aid patient management and inform treatment decisions.

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2

molecular testing

PCR

point-of-care

diagnosis

influenza

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Comments (0)

No login
gif