Hughes J, Rees S, Kalindjian S, Philpott eK (2011) Principles of early drug discovery: principles of early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 162(fasc. 6):1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sliwoski G, Kothiwale S, Meiler J, Lowe EEW (2014) Computational Methods in Drug Discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 66(fasc. 66):334–395. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007336

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stanzione F, Giangreco I, Cole eJC (2021) Use of molecular docking computational tools in drug discovery. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 273–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmch.2021.01.004

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Montalvo-Acosta JJ, Cecchini eM (2016) Computational approaches to the chemical equilibrium constant in protein-ligand binding. Molecular Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.2016000528

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lionta E, Spyrou G, Vassilatis D, Cournia EZ (2014) Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: principles, applications and recent advances. Curr Top Med Chem 14(fasc. 16):1923–1938. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026614666140929124445

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Crampon K, Giorkallos A, Deldossi M, Baud S, Steffenel ELA (2022) Machine-learning methods for ligand–protein molecular docking. Drug Discov Today 27(fasc. 1):151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.007

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Majeux N, Scarsi M, Apostolakis J, Ehrhardt C, Caflisch eA (1999) Exhaustive docking of molecular fragments with electrostatic solvation. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 3(1):88–105

Article  Google Scholar 

McNutt AT et al (2021) GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning. J. Cheminformatics 13(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Palacio-Rodríguez K, Lans I, Cavasotto CN, Cossio eP (2019) Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking. Sci Rep 9(1):5142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41594-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kurkinen ST, Lätti S, Pentikäinen OT, Postila ePA (2019) Getting docking into shape using negative image-based rescoring. J Chem Inf Model 59(8):3584–3599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00383

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Launay G et al (2020) Evaluation of CONSRANK-like scoring functions for rescoring ensembles of protein-protein docking poses. Front Mol Biosci 7:559005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.559005

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pereira GP, Cecchini eM (2021) Multibasin quasi-harmonic approach for the calculation of the configurational entropy of small molecules in solution. J Chem Theory Comput 17(2):1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00978

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Charifson PS, Corkery JJ, Murcko MA, Walters EWP (1999) Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J Med Chem 42(25):5100–5109. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm990352k

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oda A, Tsuchida K, Takakura T, Yamaotsu N, Hirono eS (2006) Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein−ligand complexes. J Chem Inf Model. 46:380–391. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci050283k

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kukol A (2011) Consensus virtual screening approaches to predict protein ligands. Eur J Med Chem 46(9):4661–4664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.05.026

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pinzi L, Rastelli eG (2019) Molecular docking: shifting paradigms in drug discovery. Int J Mol Sci 20(18):4331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184331

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abraham MJ et al (2015) GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Mysinger MM, Carchia M, Irwin JJ, Shoichet eBK (2012) Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking. J Med Chem 55(14):6582–6594. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm300687e

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barreto Gomes DE, Galentino K, Sisquellas M, Monari L, Bouysset C, Cecchini eM (2023) ChemFlow─From 2D chemical libraries to protein-ligand binding free energies. J Chem Inf Model 63(2):407–411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00919

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morgan HL (1965) The generation of a unique machine description for chemical structures-a technique developed at chemical abstracts service. J Chem Doc 5:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1021/c160017a018

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bajusz D, Rácz A, Héberger eK (2015) Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? J Cheminformatics 7(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0069-3

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Butina D (1999) Unsupervised data base clustering based on daylight’s fingerprint and Tanimoto similarity: a fast and automated way to cluster small and large data sets. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39(4):747–750. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci98033814

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Morris GM et al (2009) AutoDock4 and autodocktools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30(16):2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Trott O, Olson eAJ (2009) AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334

Article  Google Scholar 

Korb O, Stützle T, Exner ETE (2006) PLANTS: application of ant colony optimization to structure-based drug design. In: Dorigo M, Gambardella LM, Birattari M, Martinoli A, Poli R, Stützle ET (eds) Ant Colony optimization and swarm intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/11839088_22

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Koes DR, Baumgartner MP, Camacho eCJ (2013) Lessons learned in empirical scoring with Smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise. J Chem Inf Model 53(8):1893–1904. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci300604z

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alhossary A, Handoko SD, Mu Y, Kwoh eC-K (2015) Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with QuickVina 2. Bioinformatics 31(13):2214–2216. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv082

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Korb O, Stützle T, Exner eTE (2009) Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein−ligand docking with PLANTS. J Chem Inf Model 49(1):84–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800298z

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guedes IA, Pereira FSS, Dardenne eLE (2018) Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges. Front Pharmacol 9:1089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01089

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Quiroga R, Villarreal eMA (2016) Vinardo: a scoring function based on autodock vina improves scoring, docking, and virtual screening. PLOS ONE 11(5):e0155183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155183

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu S, Fu R, Zhou L-H, Chen ES-P (2012) Application of consensus scoring and principal component analysis for virtual screening against β-secretase (BACE-1). PLoS ONE 7(6):e38086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038086

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cavasotto CN, Kovacs JA, Abagyan eRA (2005) Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. J Am Chem Soc 127(26):9632–9640. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja042260c

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mandrekar JN (2010) Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 5(9):1315–1316. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sisquellas M, Cecchini eM (2021) PrepFlow: a toolkit for chemical library preparation and management for virtual screening. Mol Inform 40(12):2100139. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.202100139

Article  CAS  Google Scholar