Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A, Rodwell C, Gueydan C, Lanneau V, et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;28:165–73.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ferreira CR. The burden of rare diseases. Am J Med Genet A [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 25];179. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30883013/.
Anguela XM, High KA. Entering the modern era of gene therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2019;70:273–88.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Newby GA, Liu DR. In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing. Mol Ther. 2021;29:3107–24.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bulcha JT, Wang Y, Ma H, Tai PWL, Gao G. Viral vector platforms within the gene therapy landscape. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:1–24.
Raper SE, Chirmule N, Lee FS, Wivel NA, Bagg A, Gao G-P, et al. Fatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome in a ornithine transcarbamylase deficient patient following adenoviral gene transfer. Mol Genets Metab. 2003;80:148–58.
Gillmore JD, Maitland ML, Lebwohl D. CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1722–3.
Frangoul H, Altshuler D, Cappellini MD, Chen Y-S, Domm J, Eustace BK, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:252–60.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–21.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 2016;533:420–4.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, Bryson DI, et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017;551:464–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24644.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, Levy JM, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 2019;576:149–57.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mojica FJM, Rodriguez-Valera F. The discovery of CRISPR in archaea and bacteria. FEBS J. 2016;283:3162–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jinek M, East A, Cheng A, Lin S, Ma E, Doudna J. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. Elife. 2013;2: e00471.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang TP, Newby GA, Liu DR. Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:1089–128.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, Wang J, Xia DF, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:143–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Musunuru K. CRISPR and cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;119:79–93.
Walton RT, Christie KA, Whittaker MN, Kleinstiver BP. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science. 2020;368:290–6.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thuronyi BW, Koblan LW, Levy JM, Yeh W-H, Zheng C, Newby GA, et al. Continuous evolution of base editors with expanded target compatibility and improved activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:1070–9.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jiang W, Feng S, Huang S, Yu W, Li G, Yang G, et al. BE-PLUS: a new base editing tool with broadened editing window and enhanced fidelity. Cell Res. 2018;28:855–61.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kurt IC, Zhou R, Iyer S, Garcia SP, Miller BR, Langner LM, et al. CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:41–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koblan LW, Arbab M, Shen MW, Hussmann JA, Anzalone AV, Doman JL, et al. Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1414–25.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao D, Li J, Li S, Xin X, Hu M, Price MA, et al. Glycosylase base editors enable C-to-A and C-to-G base changes. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:35–40.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nelson JW, Randolph PB, Shen SP, Everette KA, Chen PJ, Anzalone AV, et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:402–10.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen PJ, Hussmann JA, Yan J, Knipping F, Ravisankar P, Chen P-F, et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell. 2021;184:5635–52.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Levesque S, Mayorga D, Fiset J-P, Goupil C, Duringer A, Loiselle A, et al. Marker-free co-selection for successive rounds of prime editing in human cells. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5909.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tao J, Wang Q, Mendez-Dorantes C, Burns KH, Chiarle R. Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3685.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anzalone AV, Gao XD, Podracky CJ, Nelson AT, Koblan LW, Raguram A, et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:731–40.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Choi J, Chen W, Suiter CC, Lee C, Chardon FM, Yang W, et al. Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:218–26.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhuang Y, Liu J, Wu H, Zhu Q, Yan Y, Meng H, et al. Increasing the efficiency and precision of prime editing with guide RNA pairs. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18:29–37.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tao R, Wang Y, Jiao Y, Hu Y, Li L, Jiang L, et al. Bi-PE: bi-directional priming improves CRISPR/Cas9 prime editing in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:6423–34.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jiang T, Zhang X-O, Weng Z, Xue W. Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:227–34.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
da Silva JF, Oliveira GP, Arasa-Verge EA, Kagiou C, Moretton A, Timelthaler G, et al. Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair. Nat Commun. 2022;13:760.
Kim HK, Yu G, Park J, Min S, Lee S, Yoon S, et al. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:198–206.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mathis N, Allam A, Kissling L, Marquart KF, Schmidheini L, Solari C, et al. Predicting prime editing efficiency and product purity by deep learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01613-7.
Koblan LW, Erdos MR, Wilson C, Cabral WA, Levy JM, Xiong Z-M, et al. In vivo base editing rescues Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome in mice. Nature. 2021;589:608–14.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Olive M, Harten I, Mitchell R, Beers JK, Djabali K, Cao K, et al. Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria: correlation with the vascular pathology of aging. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.209460.
Comments (0)