Measure Twice, Cut Once: Adjunctive Physiology and Imaging in Left Main PCI

1.

De la Torre Hernandez JM, Garcia Camarero T. Intravascular ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of left main coronary artery disease. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2015;4(3):361-81. (Comprehensive guidelines for IVUS of LMCA, discusses plaque morphology, studies showing MLA for intervention, PCI optimization)

PubMed  Google Scholar 

2.

Cameron A, Kemp HG, Fisher LD, Gosselin A, Judkins MP, Kennedy JW, et al. Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination. Circulation. 1983;68(3):484–9.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3.

Oviedo C. Intravascular ultrasound classification of plaque distribution in left main coronary artery bifurcations. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(2):105–12.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.

Fisher LD. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 1982;8(6):565–75.

CAS  Google Scholar 

5.

Taylor HA. Asymptomatic left main coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Circulation. 1989;79(6):1171–9.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.

Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Pocock SJ, Morice MC, Puskas J, et al. Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1820–30.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

7.

Park DW, Ahn JM, Park H, Yun SC, Kang DY, Lee PH, et al. Ten-year outcomes after drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary disease: extended follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial. Circulation. 2020;141(18):1437–46.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.

Thuijs DJFM, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Morice MC, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1325–34.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9.

Park DW, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Yoon YH, Kang DY, Lee PH, et al. 10-year outcomes of stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(23 Pt A):2813–22.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.

Buszman PE, Buszman PP, Kiesz RS, Bochenek A, Trela B, Konkolewska M, et al. Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: the LE MANS (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(16):1500–11.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

11.

Holm NR, Mäkikallio T, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):191–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

12.

Pea B. Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: the LE MANS (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(16):1500–11.

Google Scholar 

13.

Eea B. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main stem stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(5):538–45.

Google Scholar 

14.

Kurogi K, Ishii M, Sakamoto K, Tsujita K. Observing an aorto-ostial lesion using TELESCOPE in optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention, March 17, 2020. https://www.pcronline.com/Cases-resources-images/Images-interventionalcardiology/EuroIntervention-images/Aorto-ostial-lesion-observation-by-OCT. Accessed 1 Sept 2021.

15.

de la Torre Hernandez J. Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions: results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(4):351–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

16.

Kang S. Intravascular ultrasound-derived predictors for fractional flow reserve in intermediate left main disease. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011;4(11):1168-74. (study showing IVUS correlation to FFR)

PubMed  Google Scholar 

17.

Skowronski J, Cho I, Mintz GS, Wolny R, Opolski MP, et al. Inter-ethnic differences in normal coronary anatomy between Caucasian (Polish) and Asian (Korean) populations. Eur J Radiol. 2020;130(109185).

18.

Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004;110(18):2831–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

19.

Park SJ, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH, Koo BK, Lee JY, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area criteria for functionally significant left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(8):868–74.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

20.

Gao XF, Kong XQ, Zuo GF, Wang ZM, Ge Z, Zhang JJ. Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from observational studies and randomized controlled trials. US Cardiol Rev. 2020;14(e03).

21.

Qian C. Intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stents implantation: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):59387–96.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.

Sea H. Effect of intravascular ultrasound–guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(1):62–71.

Google Scholar 

23.

Mea H. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(11):1305–10.

Google Scholar 

24.

Kang S-J. Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(6):562–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

25.

Kim S. Frequency and impact of acute stent deformation after PCI of left main coronary artery disease: an EXCEL trial intravascular ultrasound substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;2017(70):Supplement B19.

Google Scholar 

26.

De la Torre HJ. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(3):244–54.

Google Scholar 

27.

Liu XM. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;21(2):83–90.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28.

Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, et al. Comparison of stent expansion guided by optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound: the ILUMIEN II study (observational study of optical coherence tomography [OCT] in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve [FFR] and percutaneous coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(13):1704–14.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

29.

Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, Shlofmitz P, Fabbiochhi F, Nazif T et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2618–28.

30.

Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, et al. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(42):3139–47.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

31.

Muramatsu T, Ozaki Y, Nanasato M, Ishikawa M, Nagasaka R, Ohota M, et al. Comparison between optical frequency domain imaging and intravascular ultrasound for percutaneous coronary intervention guidance in biolimus A9-eluting stent implantation: a randomized MISTIC-1 non-inferiority trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(11):e009314.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

32.

Amabile N. Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery: the LEMON study. EuroIntervention. 2020:EIJ-D-20–01121.

33.

Dumoulin K. Physicians struggle with when to use OCT. Diagn Interve Cardiol. May 18, 2011.https://www.dicardiology.com/article/physicians-struggle-when-use-oct. Accessed Sept 1, 2021.

34.

van der Sijde J. Safety of optical coherence tomography in daily practice: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag. 2017;18(4):467-74. (discusses safety and risks of intravascular imaging compared to conventional angiography)

PubMed  Google Scholar 

35.

Gupta A. Saline as an alternative to radio-contrast for optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021;21(00013–0):S1553-8389.

Google Scholar 

36.

Sung JG, Sharkawi MA, Shah PB, Croce KJ, Bergmark, BA. Integrating intracoronary imaging into PCI workflow and catheterization laboratory culture. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2021;14(6).

37.

Sea S. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2006;113:e166-286.

Google Scholar 

38.

Windecker S. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2541–619.

Google Scholar 

39.

Jasti V. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004;110:2831–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

40.

Rusinova RP. Intravascular ultrasound comparison of left main coronary artery disease between white and Asian patients. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:979–84.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

41.

Pijls NH. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1703–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.

Warisawa T. Safety of revascularization deferral of left main stenosis based on instantaneous wave-free ratio evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(14):1655-64. (discusses functional assessment of LMCA)

Google Scholar 

43.

Carreto E. Safety of intermediate left main stenosis revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-regression including 908 deferred left main stenosis from 12 studies. Int J Cardiol. 2018;271:42-8 . (discusses outcomes of PCI after functional assessment of LMCA)

PubMed  Google Scholar 

44.

Hamilos M. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:1505–51.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

45.

Fearon WF. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1208–17.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

46.

Fearon W. The impact of downstream coronary stenosis on fractional flow reserve assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery disease - human validation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:398–403.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

47.

Davies JE. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1824–34.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

48.

Götberg M. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813–23.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

49.

De Rosa S. Reliability of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for the evaluation of left main coronary artery lesions. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1143.

PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

50.

Warisawa T. Safety of revascularization deferral of left main stenosis based on instantaneous wave-free ratio evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(14):1655–64.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif